Skip to content Skip to footer

Two wrongs don’t make a right! Circumventing California’s Constitution for policial convenience is a dangerous precedent.

California Governor Gavin Newsom promoted and signed Assembly Bill 604 for a mid-decade redistricting plan to “fight fire with fire,” he claims, pointing to the redistricting efforts of Texas. I am not a Texan, so I cannot speak for Texas. I am a proud Californian elected to a nonpartisan local public office. I believe in practicing and teaching good governance. I respect the rule of law and my oath of office to defend California’s Constitution. I strongly advise against circumventing the Constitution for an isolated event, political convenience, or opportunity. The wrongs of other states must be instructive and not destructive of the California Constitution.

The California Constitution

Thanks to Governor Schwarzenegger, California’s redistricting is handled by an independent commission every decade. In 2008 and 2010, California voters approved two constitutional amendments that created and then expanded the power of the California Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). In 2008, Proposition 11, which transferred state legislative redistricting from the legislature to the CRC, passed with 50.8% of the vote. A countermeasure to Proposition 11 to eliminate the CRC was rejected by California voters with 59.4% voting “No.” More importantly 2010, Proposition 20 transferred congressional redistricting from the legislature to the CRC with 61.2% of the vote. 

The CRC now has exclusive authority to draw congressional districts for the State Senate, the Assembly, and the Board of Equalization districts. This authority is enshrined in the California Constitution, meaning neither the governor nor the Legislature can unilaterally override it. While the CRC is imperfect, it has worked for California for over a decade. 

Mid-Decade Prohibition of Redistricting

California’s Election Code, recently updated as the Fair Maps Act, applies explicitly to city and county districts. Still, it reinforces the voters’ intent that redistricting only occurs after a census unless legally compelled otherwise. Unless a court of competent jurisdiction finds a violation of the Voting Rights Act or any other constitutional violations, thankfully, in California, there is no legal pathway to redraw districts mid-decade. 

Only California Voters Can Change the Constitution

Given that CRC is the creation of the voters in California, any attempt to bypass or suspend its authority must be approved by the voters. This effort requires a two-thirds vote in the legislature, a statewide election, and a majority vote. The Governor pushed for, and the super majority of the one-party system in the California Legislature rushed to place this circumventing constitutional amendment before the voters in November. Sadly, this measure’s slippery slope is the antithesis of good governance. 

I hope that in November, cooler heads will prevail in not allowing the partisan political will of a few to substitute for the judgment of the majority of California Voters in 2008 and 2010. Politics and politicians must have nothing to do with drawing districts. This is why we have the CRC in California. Governor Newsom’s rhetoric and misguided efforts in this regard, while benefiting his personal political future, will further divide the country when every blue and red state starts fighting “fire with fire.” Where and when will this self-serving political manipulation of the electorate end? 

I implore the Governor and all my elected colleagues to win elections by earning the voters’ trust. Political manipulations of this sort only erode that trust.